|
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE COPPER MINING ACTIVITIES IN
LEFKE-GEMIKONAGI REGION OF NORTHERN CYPRUS : A REVIEW
Aysel T. ATIMTAY and E. Volkan SARIÇİÇEK
Middle East Technical University, Environmental Engineering Department,
06531 Ankara, TURKEY
Abstract
This paper will review the previous
studies carried out on the environmental problems that the copper mines have caused in
Lefke-Gemikonağı region due to mismanagement of the resources. The pollution generated
in surface waters, groundwater and also in the marine environment will be
discussed, and the dimensions of the problems will be emphasized.
1. INTRODUCTION
Copper has always been a very important material for Cyprus and the
history of this dates back to 5000 years from today. Even the name Cyprus is believed to
come from the word “Cuprous”. Cyprus is within the Trodos-Magmatic complex which is
rich in iron, pyrite and copper (calcopyrite). Copper mining in Cyprus, especially in
Lefke region, has begun in 1913 and continued until 1974. The companies which have
produced copper, together with some by products like CuSO4, H2SO4
and gold, in Cyprus have left the area in 1974 without taking any precautions or
preventive actions against environmental pollution.
Sulfur mineralization at the region is the result of fluids loaded with heat (Hydrothermal) at the ocean bottoms. Apart
from the raw ores in “Lefke” and “Karadağ” region, chemical wastes in
Gemikonağı Harbour, heaps of scrap materials, wastes from gold production with cyanide,
by-products of copper flotation process, pyrite waste ponds containing %25-30
sulfur cause not only soil, groundwater and sea pollution, but also air pollution by
sulfur gases resulting from excess heating in summer time. Iron and sulfur with copper
carried with surface waters might cause heavy metal pollution in potable and irrigation
waters due to acid mine drainage. According to many research reports, there are Arsenic,
Barium, Cadmium, Chromium and Selenium in high amounts at the region. The region is an
important shore ecosystem, too.
Basic environmental problems faced in the region can be summarized as
follows:
- The situation of abandoned mine sites (Karadağ and Gemikonağı region) and their
environmental impacts
- Gemikonağı dam-lake and its pollution
- Agricultural pollution caused by Gemikonağı dam-lake
- The situation of abandoned CMC copper enrichment facilities and their environmental
impacts
2. PREVIOUS RESEARCHES RELATED TO THE SUBJECT
There are several studies conducted in the last 10 years about the
environmental problems created by these copper mines. Some of these studies are
concentrated on:
- Copper mines left as they are and their effects on the environment
- Water pollution in some small dams in the mining region
- Environmental pollution in agricultural areas which is due to using the polluted water
in irrigation of these areas
- Groundwater pollution due to leaching of mining wastes.
The important studies can be summarized as follows:
- In 1970 a committee formed in the Institute of Agricultural Research has studied mine
dust precipitation on vegetation in Lefke. The leaves of plants in the region were
analyzed and the chemical analysis of the leaves were conducted by the chemical laboratory
of the Agricultural Research Institute. Results showed that there were accumulation of
mine dust on the leaves, and decrease in sizes of fruits and trees were observed. Color,
taste and other properties of fruits were also found to be adversely affected from mine
dust (Reported by Dogan, 1999).
- Water samples have been taken from Gemikonağı dam-lake, from several creeks in the
Lefke region and from several drinking water wells between the dates 15.04.1994 and
18.04.1994. The State Laboratory of Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) analyzed
these
samples. The results were compared with the Turkish (TS 266) and international standards
(EEC and WHO). As a result of this comparison Al, Fe, Mg and Mn concentrations in some
samples were found higher than the values given in the standards (Report by the State
Laboratory, 17.05.1994)
- Also, the laboratories of theGeneral Directorate of Mine Exploration in Ankara has
conducted some analysis on the water samples taken from the Lefke region by the
Municipality of Lefke, and reported their results on March 19,1997.
- Two water samples have been taken from drinking water in Lefke and from Gemikonağı
dam-lake. These samples were analyzed in the Environmental Engineering Department
Laboratories of Marmara University. In one of these samples Cr
+6 which
is included in the hazardous chemical class in TS 266 was found to be present in the
drinking water sample. Also, the concentrations of Fe and Mn were found to be higher than
the recommended levels given in the standards (Report by Marmara University, Environmental
Engineering Department, 26.03.1997).
- It is reported in an article prepared by the Lefke Environmental Society that heavy metal concentrations were found very high (even 15-17
times more than standards) in some water samples obtained from the Gemikonağı dam-lake
water. The analysis of the water samples were carried out by the State Laboratories of
TRNC (Report of the State Lab. of the TRNC,18.3.1999).
- According to a report by the State Laboratory Directorate of the Turkish Republic of
Northern Cyprus dated 28 October 1999, 8 plant samples were taken from Gemikonağı Mining
Operation Facilities of CMC on different
dates and 3 plant samples were taken from
outside of CMC facilities from places where no metal contaminations were expected. The
results of the analysis are given in Table 1 (Report by the State Lab., 1999).
- Also Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil Sciences has
investigated the samples of soil and leaves collected in the region and analyzed for the
heavy metal contents (Table 2). The results have shown alarming concentrations (Altınbaş,1999).
Table 1 . Results of the analysis of plant samples (Report by the
State Lab.,1999)
Sampling
Point |
Sample |
Amount for Analysis (gr) |
Al
(mg/kg) |
Cr
(mg/kg) |
Cu
(mg/kg) |
Fe
(mg/kg) |
Mn
(mg/kg) |
Plant samples taken from CMC Gemikonağı Mining
Facility |
Şifa otu 1 |
2.5770 |
195.03 |
15.50 |
63.72 |
|
39.43 |
Şifa otu 2 |
2.7391 |
185.28 |
16.53 |
75.32 |
|
38.92 |
Pire otu 1 |
2.3499 |
207.41 |
3.24 |
77.28 |
|
27.55 |
Pire otu 2 |
2.3497 |
213.01 |
10.42 |
58.60 |
|
32.14 |
Gabbar 1 |
3.3694 |
48.79 |
0.79 |
7.13 |
70.04 |
|
Gabbar 2 |
3.5786 |
43.59 |
0.65 |
7.37 |
60.58 |
28.11 |
Ayrelli 1 |
2.3219 |
44.02 |
1.02 |
3.34 |
|
8.66 |
Ayrelli 2 |
2.2342 |
43.13 |
0.86 |
3.90 |
|
9.38 |
Akasya 1 |
2.3048 |
115.80 |
1.25 |
11.34 |
96.93 |
43.65 |
Akasya 2 |
2.3749 |
89.39 |
1.20 |
11.26 |
96.68 |
43.24 |
Ayrık otu1 |
2.0807 |
149.71 |
2.11 |
6.07 |
164.51 |
63.44 |
Ayrık
otu2 |
2.1228 |
204.02 |
3.26 |
46.17 |
164.83 |
42.91 |
Kuzu otu 1 |
2.0349 |
234.56 |
6.51 |
5.32 |
163.74 |
69.14 |
Kuzu otu 2 |
2.0045 |
391.47 |
2.87 |
9.14 |
226.29 |
69.99 |
Çatırez 1 |
2.0403 |
64.11 |
1.33 |
0.42 |
52.10 |
12.86 |
Çatırez
2 |
2.0178 |
63.14 |
2.25 |
17.55 |
180.74 |
17.44 |
Samples from
places that probaly clean |
Şifaotu 1 |
2.3119 |
618.11 |
32.05 |
7.43 |
0.33 |
14.78 |
Şifaotu 2 |
2.3905 |
648.82 |
22.40 |
10.57 |
0.26 |
9.54 |
Pireotu 1 |
1.9515 |
67.38 |
1.04 |
3.99 |
176.33 |
7.35 |
Pireotu 2 |
2.4124 |
121.99 |
1.37 |
4.39 |
102.84 |
7.68 |
Gabbar 1 |
2.3339 |
82.95 |
0.89 |
5.49 |
82.99 |
11.48 |
Gabbar 2 |
2.7112 |
70.49 |
0.66 |
4.74 |
77.42 |
9.93 |
Table 2 . Carcinogenic heavy metal
concentrations in leaves and soil (Altınbaş, 1999)
| |
Carcinogenic Heavy Metals
in Leaves |
|
Carcinogenic Heavy
Metals in Soil |
Sample point and Plant Type |
Zn
(ppm) |
Cr
(ppm) |
Cd
(ppm) |
Pb
(ppm) |
Ni
(ppm) |
|
Depth
(cm) |
Zn
(ppm) |
Cr
(ppm) |
Cd
(ppm) |
Pb
(ppm) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-10 |
217.5 |
11.3 |
1.17 |
16.3 |
Tangerine Leaf |
15.0 |
6.0 |
0.90 |
14.5 |
5.3 |
|
10-28 |
132.5 |
9.2 |
1.02 |
12.5 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-14 |
92.5 |
11.5 |
0.93 |
45.0 |
Orange Leaf |
10.0 |
26.0 |
0.95 |
16.0 |
4.9 |
|
14-40 |
92.5 |
20.3 |
1.12 |
23.8 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-14 |
87.5 |
25.9 |
1.07 |
22.5 |
Bean Leaf |
27.0 |
2.0 |
0.48 |
22.5 |
5.3 |
|
14-33 |
80.0 |
4.5 |
0.78 |
11.3 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-14 |
67.5 |
22.3 |
1.76 |
27.5 |
Cabbage Leaf |
17.0 |
4.0 |
0.55 |
7.3 |
3.5 |
|
14-32 |
55.5 |
2.3 |
1.85 |
26.3 |
Measurements done by Prof Dr Ünal
ALTINBAŞ in March 2nd, 1999 in the Department of Soil at Ege Univ.,
Agriculture Faculty.
It is determined that chromium
concentration in samples of “şifa out” and “pire out” from contaminated area is
very high as compared to samples of şifa otu from a distant place. It is a well-known
fact that accumulated heavy metals in plants may pass through humans either by eating them
directly or consuming the meat and milk products of animals that eat the plants.
The first preliminary report on the
Environmental Problems of the Lefke-Gemikonağı region has been prepared by Erdem and his
co-workers (Erdem, 1999). This report has shed light on many problems of the region.
3. Main Environmental Problems in the Region
A. THE SITUATION OF ABANDONED MINE
SITES (KARADAĞ AND GEMİKONAĞI AREA) AND THEIR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Open pit and underground mining were
performed at Karadağ mine site and underground mining at Maden creek mine site. Mining
wastes generated were discharged to creek beds in th e region. Generally, these
waste are low-graded ores containing approximately% 0.4 copper and % 8 sulfur. The
approximate amount is 2 million tones.
Water drainage takes place with rainwater from mining sites as well as
material and waste storage sites. Acidic conditions occur with the reaction of present
concentrated minerals (pyrite, Clcopyrite, galena, etc.) with rainwater and oxygen in air.
Then contaminated water is transported to water collecting basin with surface waters and
then mixes with ground water directly. Acid mine drainage
increases metallic ions in waters in the region. As a matter of fact, samples taken from
Gemikonağı dam-lake, water wells and surface waters verify this result. Results of the
State Laboratory analysis are given in Table 3. Al, Cu, Fe, and Mn concentrations
are very high in samples from bottom weir of dam-lake according to the Turkish Water
Pollution and Control Regulation (1988) and water quality is 3rd and 4th
class according to same regulation.
Table 3. Results of the analysis on
water samples taken from the Gemikonağı dam-lake (State Laboratory Report, 1999)
Al m g/L |
As
m g/L |
Cr
m g/L |
Cu m g/L |
Fe
m g/L |
Mn
m g/L |
17/0.2/1999 |
Lake-end point |
181.3 |
Not present |
Not present |
59.8* |
68.9 |
96.8 |
Lake-bottom weir |
4227.0** |
Not present |
Not present |
2017.0** |
2654.0* |
1394.0* |
01/03/1999 |
Lake-end point |
179.9 |
Not present |
Not present |
334.3** |
41.8 |
196.0 |
Lake-bottom weir |
6747.0** |
Not present |
Not present |
3484.0** |
3479.0* |
1541.0* |
01/04/1999 |
Lake-end point |
35.4 |
nil |
nil |
19.4 |
21.7 |
<10 |
Lake-bottom weir |
10340.0** |
nil |
nil |
3713.0** |
920.5 |
1268.0* |
Long term
use |
İrrigation |
5000 |
100 |
100 |
200 |
5000 |
200 |
Limits term
use |
Irrigation |
20000 |
2000 |
1000 |
5000 |
20000 |
10000 |
* 3rd Quality (Turkish Water
Pollution and Control Regulation, 1988)
**4th Quality (Turkish Water Pollution and
Control Regulation, 1988)
B. GEMİKONAĞI DAM-LAKE AND ITS
POLLUTION
The construction of the Gemikonağı
dam, which is on the basin of Maden creek and mine production site, was completed in 1994.
The capacity of the dam is 4 million m 3 and it is constructed for
irrigational purposes. The irrigation field of the dam is designed as 130 hectar. There
are mining wastes at the sides of the hills surrounding the dam-lake. There are also two
water wells at the upstream of the dam-lake. These wells were used for drinking water
supply in the past but later they were started to use as irrigational water supply because
of the possibility of pollution due to the acid mine drainage.
Acid mine drainage at the region was
clarified dramatically by GÖKÇEKUŞ (1995) in the “2 nd Water
Convention” organized by ACTEAC in Feburary 23-24, 1995. At this period, totally 17
water samples were taken from creeks fed by Trodos Ophiolite Complex, from accumulated waters rich in mineral content, and from Gemikonağı
dam-lake. The results of the analysis are given in Table 4.
Table 4. Chemical Analysis Results of
Water Samples (Gökçekuş, 1995)
Sample No |
Location Name |
PH |
2E.1
m s/cm |
Cl
ppm |
SO4
ppm |
CO3
ppm |
HCO3
ppm |
NO3
ppm |
Na
ppm |
Ca
ppm |
Mg
ppm |
K
ppm |
Boron
ppm |
Cu
ppm |
Zn
ppm |
Ni
ppm |
Fe
ppm |
1 |
01/12/94 |
Yeşilırmak
creek |
6.96 |
823 |
95 |
92 |
* |
262 |
161 |
122 |
30 |
27 |
5.60 |
- |
* |
* |
* |
* |
2 |
01/12/94 |
Drinking Water well |
7.15 |
492 |
40 |
72 |
* |
196 |
3 |
32 |
45 |
27 |
0.30 |
- |
* |
0.05 |
* |
0.08 |
3 |
01/12/94 |
Maden creek |
7.36 |
458 |
30 |
62 |
* |
190 |
3 |
29 |
40 |
24 |
0.40 |
- |
* |
* |
* |
* |
4 |
01/12/94 |
Lefke creek |
7.90 |
497 |
30 |
70 |
* |
202 |
10 |
29 |
40 |
32 |
0.90 |
- |
0.04 |
* |
* |
0.01 |
5 |
01/12/94 |
Gemikonağı
damlake |
6.60 |
712 |
45 |
284 |
* |
74 |
3 |
29 |
65 |
48 |
0.70 |
- |
0.732 |
0.32 |
* |
0.06 |
6 |
01/12/94 |
“ “ |
6.60 |
722 |
45 |
274 |
* |
78 |
3 |
32 |
65 |
44 |
0.70 |
- |
0.792 |
0.31 |
0.05 |
0.16 |
7 |
01/12/94 |
“ “ |
6.381 |
722 |
45 |
290 |
* |
72 |
3 |
32 |
65 |
46 |
0.70 |
- |
0.962 |
0.37 |
* |
0.10 |
8 |
01/12/94 |
“ “ |
6.52 |
713 |
45 |
280 |
* |
78 |
3 |
46 |
65 |
46 |
0.80 |
- |
0.612 |
0.30 |
* |
0.15 |
9 |
01/12/94 |
Bottom weir side |
4.682 |
880 |
45 |
4242 |
* |
10 |
3 |
32 |
70 |
66 |
0.70 |
- |
3.432 |
1.021 |
0.02 |
2.041 |
10 |
01/12/94 |
Bottom weir canal |
6.441 |
780 |
45 |
3201 |
* |
66 |
2 |
34 |
80 |
43 |
1.10 |
- |
0.752 |
0.34 |
* |
0.18 |
11 |
01/12/94 |
Maden creek |
2.422 |
3950 |
55 |
37002 |
* |
* |
151 |
8 |
200 |
830 |
0.30 |
- |
50.902 |
6.602 |
0.232 |
408.02 |
12 |
01/12/94 |
Lefke creek canal end |
7.60 |
500 |
30 |
62 |
* |
208 |
171 |
27 |
30 |
39 |
0.90 |
- |
0.071 |
0.03 |
* |
0.03 |
13 |
01/12/94 |
Çamlık
creek |
8.08 |
765 |
50 |
80 |
* |
404 |
262 |
41 |
37 |
78 |
1.50 |
- |
* |
0.05 |
* |
* |
14 |
01/12/94 |
Çakıl
creek |
8.18 |
865 |
60 |
55 |
* |
328 |
151 |
45 |
57 |
45 |
1.10 |
- |
* |
0.04 |
* |
* |
15 |
01/12/94 |
Do ğancı creek |
7.85 |
660 |
35 |
230 |
* |
134 |
131 |
32 |
60 |
45 |
0.08 |
- |
* |
0.02 |
* |
* |
16 |
01/12/94 |
End of Derivation Channel |
8.20 |
700 |
45 |
70 |
* |
348 |
171 |
39 |
37 |
63 |
1.20 |
- |
* |
* |
* |
* |
17 |
01/12/94 |
Güzelyurt creek |
7.87 |
425 |
25 |
55 |
* |
154 |
131 |
20 |
45 |
18 |
1.10 |
- |
* |
* |
* |
* |
1 3rd Quality according to the Turkish Water
Pollution and Control Regulation, 1988.
2 4th Quality according to the Turkish Water
Pollution and Control Regulation, 1988.
It is obvious from the results of the table that water with these
characteristics cannot be used for neither drinking nor irrigational purposes.
In order to prevent the dam-lake reservoir from acid mine drainage,
sides of the dam-lake are surrounded with drainage canals. This precaution prevented
dam-lake from acidification and heavy metal pollution partly caused by rainwater. Drainage
water from the sides of the dam-lake is discharged outside of the dam-lake reservoir
without any control. This situation creates another problem for groundwater pollution.
C. AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION CAUSED BY
GEMİKONAĞI DAM-LAKE.
It is understood from the results of
analysis that heavy metals arising from mining wastes cause pollution in irrigation water
after Gemikonağı dam-lake started to operate. If microelements are examined in the soil
of irrigational basin of Gemikonağı dam -lake, It is seen that concentrations
of copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn) are above the critical values
that plants need.
When the results of irrigation water analysis is examined, some values
especially copper and manganese in some samples are above the irrigational water criteria
according to the Turkish Water Pollution Control Regulation issued in1988.
Especially the acidic pH of dam-lake water at the bottom weir causes an increase in
mobility of heavy metals in soil and may give damage to plants. High concentrations of
trace elements in soils of dam-lake basin and again the acidic pH of irrigation water and
its high heavy metal content show that there is an agricultural pollution in the basin.
Especially the accumulation of heavy metal in plants that humans eat enhances the
possibility of hazard.
D. THE SITUATION OF ABANDONED CMC COPPER PROCESSING AND
ENRICHMENT FACILITIES AND ITS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS.
CMC copper processing and enrichment facilities occupy an area of 2500
decar from Gemikonağı harbor to Maden creek. Pollution
sources present in the facility area can be classified as follows:
a- Gold mining wastes that probably
contain cyanide at Gemikonağı Harbor area
b- The final wastes of copper floatation facilities in the area of processing facilities at the entrance of Gemikonağı
These are the wastes remaining after enrichment of copper. It is known
that, however, they are kept in ponds and they spread out in a wide area. They contain
harmful metal salts.
4. CONCLUSION
Gemikonağı CMC wastes are firstly an
international problem. This subject should be discussed according to international laws.
According to the law, the companies are responsible from CRADLE to GRAVE for
the environmental pollution that they have created. The pollution created in Cyprus
endangers the East and Middle Mediterranean countries such as Turkey, Israel, Egypt,
Lebanon, Greece, and Italy. Accumulation of heavy metals like arsenic and barium
constitutes an important problem in East Mediterranean. The ECOBALANCE of the East
Mediterranean is very important. Agriculture in this area is in danger.
Previous investigations have shown that, pollution in the area is much
more severe than it is estimated. Another important subject here is long term effect of
the heavy metals. Here environmental disaster is not only affecting the people living in
the Lefke or Karadag Region, but also the countries of the Eastern Mediterranean.
Research results show that there is a heavy metal pollution such as
arsenic, barium, and cadmium in the East Mediterranean region. For this reason, the
problem should be addressed immediately.
5. REFERENCES
Report of the State Laboratory Directorate of the Turkish Republic of
Nothern Cyprus, dated 17.05.1994.
Report of the General Directorate of Mine Exploration (MTA), Ankara,
dated 19.03.1997.
Report of the Marmara University, Environmental Engineering Department,
26.03.1997.
Report of the State Laboratory Directorate of the Turkish Republic of
Nothern Cyprus, dated 18.03.1999.
Report by the Sate Laboratories Directorate of the Turkish Republic of
Northern Cyprus, Halil Çağnan, Director of Radiation and
Environment Analysis Branch, 28.10.1999.
Altınbaş, U., Report prepared in the
Department of Soil, Ege Univ., Agriculture Faculty, 1999.
Doğan, F., Report on Environmental
Problems Created by the Copper Mine Wastes in Lefke Region and the Effect on the
Public Health, November 1999.
Erdem, U., Report on the Environmental
Problems of the Lefke-Gemikonağı Region, 9.06.1999.
Gökçekuş, H. and Gökçekuş, H.,
“Maden Yataklarında Meydana Gelen Yüzey-Yeraltı Suyu Kirliliği ile Bu Kirliliğin
İnsan Sağlığı Yönünden Önemi”, Kıbrıs Türk Mühendis ve Mimar Odaları
Birliği, 2. Water Convention, 23-24 February 1995, Lefkoşa, p.131-157. |